Keyword Suggestions

Results
 
 
Account Login
 
 
 
 
 

Library Navigation

 
 

Browse Meetings

 
 
 
D4.04 - Assessing the Optimal Temperature and Light Intensity for Water Splitting on Hematite Photoanodes 
Date/Time:
April 23, 2014   2:15pm - 2:30pm
 
Speaker:
 
Taxonomy
 
 
 
Share:
 

Photoelectrochemical cells (PECs) have attracted enormous attention for solar hydrogen generation. An overwhelming majority of the work has focused on room-temperature PECs, as it is believed that the efficiency of photovoltaic devices decreases with increasing temperature. While that the photovoltage generally decreases with temperature due to the rising intrinsic carrier concentration, electrocatalytic activity and minority/majority carrier transport properties in many materials actually improve with temperature. Hematite, in particular, is a promising material for elevated-temperature PECs (achieved through moderate concentration) because both the minority and majority carrier mobilities increase exponentially with temperature as a result of improved electron hopping dynamics. Therefore, room temperature is not likely the optimal temperature to operate hematite-based PECs.In this work, we used various Ti-doped hematite thin films grown by pulsed-laser deposition as a model system to study the effect of temperature and light intensity on the photoelectrochemical properties. To eliminate possible microstructural effects across multiple samples, all of the photoanodes were dense and smooth (roughness < 1nm). These hematite-based photoanodes were characterized in a temperature-controlled photoelectrochemical cell (5 - 80 C) using a concentrated solar simulator (up to 10 suns). The photovoltage decreased as expected with increasing temperature. However, at the same time, we observed a significant enhancement in the photocurrent under the synergetic effect of temperature and light intensity. Tuning both temperature and light intensity opens up the opportunity to further enhance PEC efficiency, and to understand the semiconductor/liquid interface.
 


 
 
Average Rating: (No Ratings)
  Was great, surpassed expectations, and I would recommend this
  Was good, met expectations, and I would recommend this
  Was okay, met most expectations
  Was okay but did not meet expectations
  Was bad and I would not recommend this
 



Submit
 
Keynote Address
Panel Discussion - Different Approaches to Commercializing Materials Research
Business Challenges to Starting a Materials-Based Company
Fred Kavli Distinguished Lectureship in Nanoscience
Application of In-situ X-ray Absorption, Emission and Powder Diffraction Studies in Nanomaterials Research - From the Design of an In-situ Experiment to Data Analysis